The sentiment among federal employees regarding the prospect of a second Trump term has been notably tense, as described in recent reports.
There’s a widespread feeling of dread among federal employees across various departments. This anxiety stems from concerns over job security, potential mass layoffs, and the fear of being replaced by political appointees or loyalists, which could significantly alter the non-partisan nature of civil service roles.
There’s particular worry about the reinstatement of Schedule F, an executive order from Trump’s first term that would make it easier to fire federal workers by categorizing them as at-will employees. This could lead to significant changes in how federal employees are hired and retained, potentially politicizing roles traditionally protected by merit-based systems.
During Trump’s first term, actions like the relocation of the Bureau of Land Management headquarters led to resignations and retirements, setting a precedent for potential disruptions in future terms.
Discussions across the internet reveal a mix of sympathy for federal workers facing uncertainty, criticism towards those concerned (suggesting the dread might be overblown or deserved), and others expressing a desire for government efficiency reforms which might include reducing the workforce.
Significant changes could impact over 2 million federal employees, especially those in the DC-Maryland-Virginia metro area, where nearly 449,000 federal workers reside, but also in states that voted for Trump.
The shift towards a more politically aligned workforce could affect the continuity and impartial execution of governmental functions, potentially leading to what’s described as a return to a “spoils system” where political loyalty overshadows competence or merit.
Many federal employees are reportedly considering retirement or are hesitant to accept new positions due to the uncertainty. This situation has led to discussions about the future of federal employment, with some workers feeling anxious enough to label their situation as experiencing “PTSD” from the anticipation of policy changes.
While there’s clear evidence of unease, not all federal employees might share the same level of concern. The narrative could be influenced by media portrayal, political leanings, or the specific experiences of certain departments more than others.
Currently, the discourse around federal employment changes under Trump is politically charged. Critics of Trump might emphasize the threat to the merit system, while supporters could view these changes as necessary reforms for efficiency or alignment with his policy goals.
The situation reflects a complex interplay between policy changes, political intentions, and the personal livelihoods of federal employees, with certain outcomes still up in the air as Trump isn’t due to be sworn in as President until January 20th, 2025.
