Home Blog Page 52

Otters, Beavers, and other things that might go Bump in the woods

I was looking at a story recently in the news about how a small group of people were accosted by a small group of Otters on a float trip down the Jefferson River.

It’s an unfortunate incident that may or may not have been avoidable given the conditions of the day on the river and the proximity of the territory of the Otters themselves. Either way it appears, these animals saw what they deemed was a potential threat to their area and responded how wild animals might often do … with aggression.

Animals like Otters, Beavers, Snakes, Deer, and even Elk aren’t real known for their aggressive tendencies. We usually don’t hear of the aggression until the warning signs are ignored.

Every one of these animals have a set of warning signs that are designed to let you know that they are there. A rattle snake for instance, doesn’t rattle his tail to tell all of his buddies that you are there — he rattles his tail to let “you” know that “he” is there. Beavers are much the same as that. A sharp slap on the water with his tail might do well to give you a clue as to his presence.

Most of these animals would prefer to not have a confrontation, but if the boundaries are pushed far enough, they are more than ready to meet the challenge at hand in order to restore their own perceived notions of personal space, safety, and peace.

My encounter with a Beaver one year when I was young up the West Fork of the Bitterroot at Pierce Creek taught me a thing or two. I ignored the warning signs and as a result, played hell getting out of there. Beavers, not too unlike any other form of our Montana wildlife, can be forces to be reckoned with if you ignore the warning signs.

I saw a video a month or so ago of a Bear stuck between two groups of people hiking a trail up at Glacier National Park and the Bear ultimately chose an alternate route down the mountain side in order to avoid having a run-in with either group. Though the Bear might not have preferred to take the route that he did, I’m pretty sure that he chose that route so that he might maintain his own personal space and peace.

Sometimes we wander off into an animals personal range and space without even realizing it and as a result we are confronted with the unexpected and seemingly out of the blue responses from the animals themselves. Situational awareness is pretty important if you’re in the woods or on the river because sometimes we might miss the warning signs.

These animals, in their own way, speak to us — The clicking, chirping, whistling, and rattling are all forms of communication they use for not only their own protection, but for our protection as well … we all might do well to be better focused and tuned in to what these animals might be trying to tell us.

Being aware of our surroundings can help greatly when we consider the Otters, Beavers, and other things that might go Bump in the woods.

Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks posted a response with regard to this incident:

FWP advises recreationists to keep a wide distance, giving all wildlife plenty of space. In drought conditions, low water levels can bring recreationists closer to water-dwelling wildlife. Being aware and keeping your distance can help avoid dangerous encounters, reduce stress for wildlife, and promote healthy animal behavior. If you are attacked by an otter, fight back, get away and out of the water, and seek medical attention.

Read the entire press release here:

https://fwp.mt.gov/homepage/news/2023/aug/0803-3-women-injured-by-otter-on-jefferson-river

Thrust faults of the Rocky Mountain Front

Thrust faults of the Rocky Mountain Front — Living and working and playing on Montana’s Rocky Mountain Front is pretty epic when you stop to consider just exactly how wonderfully the entire area is built.

Geologists have spent a great deal of time over the years working out just how the Rocky Mountain Front came to be, from mapping the numerous fault zones to determining the types and kinds of strata involved with all of the uplift.

The Rocky Mountain Front is characterized by the fold-and-thrust belt system (see Geologic Map of Choteau Quadrangle; thrust faults are mapped with the ‘sawteeth’ on the upper block (hanging wall) of the thrust fault. Generally, the thrust faults run northwest-southeast and dip (point) to the southwest (propagating the formations towards the east-northeast).

Thrust faults often have a deep-seated sole thrust (a decollement), and as the upper plate is transported, a series of subsidiary thrust faults “ramp up” through the stratigraphic section. This creates an imbricate thrust zone. The thrust faults propagate through the system repeating the stratigraphic units as shortening continues. The youngest movement will occur along the front edge of the thrust system.

To get a better view of how the Rocky Mountain Front was and is being built even today you can view this animation created by Paul Karabinos, Department of Geosciences, Williams College below:

video
play-sharp-fill

This 3D block diagram was made using Trimble SketchUp.

2,395 earthquakes recorded in Montana during 2018
2,395 earthquakes recorded in Montana during 2018

Western Montana is riddled with a great number of faults as a result of this fold-and-thrust belt system.

2,000 to 3,000 Northern Rocky Mountain earthquakes happen in a typical year. Most of these earthquakes did not cause significant ground shaking but even still, the Northern Rocky Mountains are definitely still on-the-move.

Intermountain Seismic Belt and the Centennial Tectonic Belt
Intermountain Seismic Belt and the Centennial Tectonic Belt

 

Our Montana home is a seismically active state. Large historical earthquakes as well as modern frequent small and moderate-sized earthquakes demonstrate the very real possibility of future damaging earthquakes. Seismologists as of yet, still can’t predict the specific times, locations, and magnitudes of future earthquakes, but past experience says that future seismic activity is most likely to occur in regions where previous earthquakes were common.

In Montana, most—but not all—earthquakes occur in the western one-third of the state along two related zones named the Intermountain Seismic Belt and the Centennial Tectonic Belt.

The Rocky Mountain Front has a rugged beauty all it’s own — A rugged beauty that couldn’t exist if it weren’t for the tectonic forces involved.

Knowing the science behind the creation of our Rocky Mountain Front just makes it even more beautiful than it ever was before.

sourced:
Sarah Anne Devaney, Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University
Paul Karabinos, Department of Geosciences, Williams College

Sloppy Joe Casserole

Ingredients:

1 lb cooked extra lean ground beef
1 cup diced onions
1 can of Sloppy Joe sauce (Manwich)
2/3 cup light shredded mozzarella cheese
1 7 1/2 oz can of Pillsbury biscuits (In the 4 value pack, you can use bigger biscuits and weigh out or increase points)
1 1/2 Tbsp melted reduced calorie margarine
2 cloves fresh garlic, diced
1 tsp dried oregano

Directions:

Cook your ground beef and onions on the stove in a pan, drain.
Preheat oven to 350F, spray a 9 inch square dish.
Add your sauce to your meat and simmer on low for 5 minutes, stirring well.
Pour meat mixture into your dish, top with cheese.
Place 9 of your 10 biscuit dough pieces on top of mixture, you will have 1 extra biscuit.
Bake in oven for 14 minutes.
Just before the time is up, melt margarine and add diced garlic and oregano.
Remove dish from oven and using a small spoon, drizzle your garlic butter over top of all your biscuits.
Return to oven for 6-8 minutes, until your biscuits are a golden brown.
Makes 9 servings

Kate’s Ag – Montana red winter wheat harvest 2023

Back in the late ’70’s early ’80’s I had the opportunity to cut wheat in Kansas and Nebraska. At the time I was somewhat surprised to be assigned a new Gleaner N7 equipped with an AC 24′ header. That usually didn’t happen with somebody my age back in the day, as younger folks were usually assigned to much older equipment.

I may not have realized it at the time, but upon looking back, I really learned a lot about dry-land farming back in those days. All we ever did was straight cut back in Kansas, sometimes nearly dogging the header into the ground to get wheat that might have been laid lower by the wind.

In the video below:

Kate explains the differences between swathing and straight cutting wheat (among some other things). It’s a great video and I hope you enjoy it.

Working the harvest is something that I think more young people should try at least once in their lifetime. The rewards far outweigh the heat and the occasional equipment breakdowns.

More about Kate:

According to her site, Kate Stephens, is a 19-year-old 4th-generation Montana farmer. Her family has been farming wheat in north-central Montana since her great-grandfather immigrated from Denmark in 1912 and homesteaded north of Great Falls.

Her family has been teaching her about farming since she was two years old. She operates one of the combines on the farm at harvest.

She also believes that it is important for everyone to know where their food comes from and the families who produce it.
She loves her farm, and hopes that her Farm to Fashion and Farm to Table products can help educate people about where their food comes from in a fun way.

You can catch up with Kate:

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/kates_ag/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/katesag

Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/kates_ag/

You can also grab your very own Kate’s Ag Tote Bag or Kate’s Ag 100% Cotton Grown in the U.S.A. T-Shirt by visiting her website: https://www.katesag.com

If you have a farm that you would like Kate to feature, you are encouraged to contact her at: info@katesag.com

Thanks for the read.

Happy Trails

Sometimes it doesn’t pay to be the nice guy

Sometimes it doesn’t pay to be the nice guy, according to a University of Guelph study.

Ask anyone who they might prefer to work with, nice guys or bullies, and you’ll get a fast and certain reply — just about everyone will say that they prefer to share an office with kindhearted and positive people.

That’s what people say, anyway.

Highly cooperative and generous people can attract hatred and social punishment, especially in competitive circumstances, the research found.

The study, conducted by professor Pat Barclay and undergraduate student Aleta Pleasant, is published in Psychological Science.

Sometimes what people claim to want and how they actually behave can be completely at odds. While everyone praises kindness and cooperation, exceptionally nice people often find their good deeds met with nastiness, ridicule, exploitation, and backstabbing.

Why do you suppose that is?

You could conclude (not entirely without foundation) that humans are sometimes nasty, hypocritical creatures, but according to the study, the reason our stated ideals and our real-life actions fail to match up is more complicated than that. Being cooperative and nice, the research found, can actually come across as threatening.

Highly cooperative and generous people can make others look bad

Psychology professor Pat Barclay and his collaborators discovered, when they brought study subjects into the lab to play a series of economic games, that things are different when a real-life person starts playing the role of being cooperative and generous. Exceptionally generous and hard-working colleagues make those around them look bad. Their super-kindness and productivity challenge other employees to perform at the same level, and that can stir up nasty reactions, the researchers found.

“Most of the time, we like the cooperators, the good guys,” Barclay commented, but when people find themselves in competitive environments such as many offices have, the script flips. “People will hate on the really good guys. This pattern has been found in every culture in which it has been looked at.” In particularly tough environments, people will attack an exceptionally nice, hard working person, even if doing so harms the group as a whole.

While Barclay’s research wasn’t designed to suggest real-world strategies for those impacted by this nasty human tendency to punish the exceptionally nice, he does have some suggestions.

“It might help to turn the tables on the criticizers: Point out that they’re just attacking to prevent themselves from looking bad” was his first suggestion. But the best solution may be even more straightforward: Don’t put yourself in situations where you have to work with terrible people.

Sometimes it doesn’t pay to be the nice guy — “Perhaps the best solution is to just find better associates. If you’re being criticized for being too nice or for working too hard, then go find others who are just as nice and hard working as you. When cooperative people work with one another, they end up much better off than their critics,” Barclay advises.

According to Barclay’s study. There is a real, scientifically validated reason that being extra good can sometimes bring out the worst in people. That shouldn’t stop you from being who you are at work, but it should make you more careful about whom you spend your kindness on.

Pat Barclay - Sometimes it doesn’t pay to be the nice guyPat Barclay is an evolutionary psychologist whose research combines the fields of evolutionary biology, animal behavior, social psychology, mathematical game theory, and experimental economics to study topics such as: cooperation, altruism, reputation, punishment, friendship, partner choice, trust, biological markets, costly signaling, and risk-taking.