Internet Web Browsers these days are about as varied and unique as the many auto builders were at the turn of the 20th century.

Seems that to one extent or the other, everyone has got their hands into what they think is the best when it comes down to building a safe and functioning web browser.

I predict that in 2010, security in so many ways, will give way to speed and flexibility, as both Microsoft and Mozilla discover that speed is essential to the end user. The end user doesn’t understand all of the patch/security issues. All they care about is how fast, or painfully slow their browsers are.

I recently had a bit of time on my hands, and being the history buff that I am, I took it upon myself to reacquaint myself with internet web browsers, both old and new.

My first stop down memory lane brought me to .. Browser Archive.

It is indeed a fun place to mess around in, because the archive has listed, nearly every known internet web browser there is or ever was,

In the archive you’ll find the likes of Mosaic, Arcweb, Ncompass, Omniweb, and a whole host of others that you have never heard of, or just plain forgotten about.

I’ve used, or have experienced many of the browsers in the archive, at one point in time or the other, and if memory serves me correctly, some were great, and others were, well, not so great. At any rate, I might suggest you take a good long stroll down memory lane, and check out some of the browsers of the internet yesteryear.

Today’s modern browsers have all got their own quirks. I say this because it wasn’t until recently I actually took the time to use the ones I could find.

The list:

Internet Explorer
Firefox
Opera
Flock
Safari
Avant
Maxthon

I used each of these browsers for a period of time in order to maximize the experience. I used these browsers with all of the defaults set, like a regular internet user would. I also threw the concerns for any potential browser security out the window and used them all as they were set up to function, out of the box.

What I found was the top two, Internet Explorer, and Firefox, had a range of issues, that included various hang-ups, crashes, and freezes .. the problems mostly occurred on social networking sites that used java scripting and flash extensively.

The only browser that actually handled the heavily scripted and cluttered social networking sites well, was Opera.

Flock, though built on the Firefox base, actually outperformed Firefox both in speed and rendering when it came to sites like Myspace and Youtube .. another surprise, but then again, maybe not, as Flock is built with social networking in mind.

Avant, Safari, and Maxthon all brought up the rear. I especially liked Safari because of it’s very simple look and feel.

I don’t think the end user cares much for things like css3, or html5 .. all they care about is whether or not the site loads quickly, and once loaded … can they see it?

Microsoft and Mozilla have been so off into this security thing lately, that I’m afraid it is degrading the overall performance of their products.

Speed is what it’s been all about all along, and the browsers of today aren’t even in the least, speedy. We chose speed over all else. The days of 28k connections are all but just a fleeting memory now, as broadband comes into it’s own.

Broadband does a really good job of hiding the internet browser bloat that runs rampant online these days.

Internet browsers, by and large, are no different that the cars and trucks people buy. Some are built for the highway, while yet others, are built for the off road. Browsers are no different than this.

Mozilla fanboys that jump up and declare another browser inferior to their beloved Firefox is just plain stupid IMO.

If you wrote all of the web browsers exactly the same way, to do the same exact things .. what sense would there be in having a brand?

Up until recently, Firefox and Internet Explorer complimented each other by their differences .. now, it appears, that we are seeing both browsers tripping over many of the same things.

End users didn’t care that Microsoft took shortcuts .. as long as the pages viewed, the end user was happy.

Web developers liked Firefox because it was dodgy and difficult. The fact that earlier versions of Firefox viewed the web so oddly was an open challenge to developers, and they took Mozilla to some new heights as a result.

The issues with regard to speed will, in the end, I feel, give other, faster and fairly competent browsers like Flock, Opera, and Avant, a leg up in the industry.

In the end, as much as I hate to admit it, I’ve found the two, Opera, and Flock, to be the winners out of the list above.

Sure, I’ll still use Firefox and Internet Explorer .. for testing page builds. The others, I’ll be using for general internet surfing and social networking.

A bunch of the guys, and gals, over at Webmasterworld have essentially committed themselves to trying Bing for a month.

And in this post I’ll invite anyone reading to join the month long use of Bing as their primary internet search provider.

When I started using Bing full-time I promised myself that I would leave the Google default search in my Firefox toolbar — only just today did I change it.

I don’t care for the pretty pictures that display on Bing’s homepage and the only way to prevent my having to look at them was to set Bing as the default search in Firefox.

So far it appears that there are many things to like about Bing.

One of those things is how Bing arranges it’s sitelinks. Another is how the content on the search pages is laid out. Easy to look at actually. The fine blue text is easier to look at than the bold blue. Bing’s layout is fairly organized, and if you like the way Facebook is laid out, then you’re going to love the simplicity of Bing’s layout.

I also like that Bing delivers, at least so far, non generic search results.
It so far has taken Bing to show me just how mundane and predictable the search results are on Google.

At any rate for a month I’m going to just Bing-It if I need to find something online. And you’re invited to join in.

TweetMeme finds the hottest stories from twitter for you to retweet

At least this is what Tweetmeme would want you to believe.

The purpose, from what I can gather, is that tweetmeme is a service that allows you to retweet twitter tweets .. your retweet basically points people to the story that was posted on Twitter by someone else.

Fair enough .. if you use Twitter, be prepared to have others copy your headlines.

Scrapers have discovered a wonderful way to abuse the Tweetmeme service, in that instead of pointing to the headline in the original tweet or site, the headline url is redirected to a website other than that of the original author.

(Visit the linked text above, and click on any one of the links he has and you’ll see what I mean)

The original content is lifted from the source blog or other publication and re-posted on the scraper domain and the retweet url is written to point to the scraper site.

I won’t name names in this case, but today’s incident involved a few boneheads in India that somehow thought that it would be really cool to steal my content and re-post it on their own domain, with a retweet pointing to it.

I’ll thank Google for pointing all of this out to me in the first place.

A while after posting, I searched the keyword(s) used in the article and found it top slot in the SERPS .. 5 minutes after that, the scraped article appeared two positions down from mine.

I followed up on what I considered to be a bogus listing by first notifying Google. I supplied the scraper source code, including all of the Adsense and analytics information contained within.

I then began to prepare a DMCA filing because the scraper was hosted on American servers. I then made initial contact to the owners in India. I also cc’ed their web host into any emails I sent so that they would be made aware of the incident and what exactly I planned to do about it.

Long story short, the content was removed as quickly as these wanna-be scrapers could remove it.

I knew what their web host would do under the terms of the DMCA and so did they. Google, on the other hand, might be a different story. The scraper domain is destined to be banned anyway because of the abuses and whether or not my report of the abuse to Google has sped the process up remains to be seen — either way — this scraper site is history.

Tweetmeme has a long ways to go in curbing all of the abuse it is getting at the hands of site scrapers and for now the ranges are blocked, and probably will be for the duration.

I’ve been sending video via email for years — it’s really nothing new at all.

Whenever I produce a marketing or other kind of instructional video, and want to include it in my monthly newsletter, I simply write it into the source code of our email client like this;

<iframe src =”https://www.your-website.com/Untitled-1.htm” width=”420″ height=”400″>
<p>Your browser does not support iframes.</p>
</iframe>

They can watch the video right in their email and can also download it if they wish with a hyperlink provided below the iframe window.

For .flash or .gif?

Using the same iframe structure you can have a flash header load too. You’ll want to write the iframe to the specific size of the flash file itself so everything fits. Your email recipient will be able to actually click on the flash links located in the header to visit the site directly.

You can also place more than one iframe into the email source code, so if by chance you have a flash footer you can include that too — with a bit of select positioning — of course.

You also may want to write out any scrolling and/or borders so that everything blends seamlessly.

Happy Coding